GCL Synthesis Pilot Review Packet¶
Generated from
synthesis/pilot_registry.json. Office entries are review questions, not self-authenticating dispositions.
- Registry:
GCL-SYNTHESIS-PILOT-001 - Work package issue: #191
- Portfolio prerequisite merge:
86a3f551f35aa67bdd0437d060ce786cb3d447fb
Office review matrix¶
| Office | Review question | Candidate status |
|---|---|---|
| Axiomatist | Are source and target assumptions explicit, compatible where required, and free of hidden equivalence claims? | pending_external_review |
| Cartographer | Are source, target, dependency, and evidence links exact and navigable without mutable-only authority? | pending_external_review |
| Verifier | Do accepted transfers have bounded executable consequences and falsifying tests that can be replayed? | pending_external_review |
| Adversary | Can analogy inflation, assumption loss, circular transfer, or claim widening survive the validator? | pending_external_review |
| Formalist | Are dispositions, contradiction states, and non-transferability machine-checkable without prose inference? | pending_external_review |
| Amanuensis | Are generated reports faithful to protected records and are mutable mirrors clearly non-authoritative? | pending_external_review |
| Referee | Does the exact candidate remain within its transfer jurisdiction and claim boundaries? | pending_external_review |
| Human Steward | Should this bounded synthesis pilot receive protected activation without authorizing downstream packages? | pending_external_review |
Required activation sequence¶
- External exact-head review.
- Explicit Human Steward release for the exact candidate head.
- Protected expected-head merge.
No row in this packet records its own approval.