Publication State Model — Type Theory Monograph Series
Purpose
This file separates four states that must never be collapsed across the TYPE THEORY — The Grand Unified Theory of Computation monograph series:
- composition complete — the manuscript, solutions, plates, laboratories, audits, and release artifacts satisfy the internal composition/publication gates for an exact candidate revision;
- durably admitted — that exact candidate revision, or an exact checksummed rebuildable representation of it, has been admitted to protected repository state and read back from that state;
- independently reviewed — the exact admitted revision has received the required independent mathematical review, with the reviewer record stating what was and was not established;
- published authoritative edition — an explicit authority decision permits the exact reviewed revision to be represented as the published authoritative edition.
These are distinct state transitions. Passing one does not imply the next.
Controlling principle
A technically polished artifact does not acquire authority from appearance, completeness, or self-consistency alone. Claim scope, evidence, limitations, provenance, review state, and permitted use must remain inspectable.
This series-level state model is consistent with the bounded institutional position represented by GCL-POS-01 version 0.1.0, as admitted for bounded pilot use by docs/council/submissions/GCL-TCS-00_GCL-POS-01_AUTHORITY_DECISION.json. Current protected MATH-PROGRAMME doctrine controls any conflict. This file does not promote GCL-POS-01 beyond its recorded authority or create new mathematical authority.
State machine
DRAFT / DEVELOPMENT
|
| internal composition and publication gates
v
RC_COMPOSITION_COMPLETE
|
| exact-revision durable admission + protected readback
v
RC_DURABLY_ADMITTED
|
| independent mathematical review of that exact revision
v
RC_REVIEW_QUALIFIED
|
| explicit publication/authority disposition
v
PUBLISHED_AUTHORITATIVE_EDITION
A superseding revision returns to the appropriate earlier state. Review does not automatically transfer to materially changed bytes.
Required meanings
RC_COMPOSITION_COMPLETE
May be used when the candidate satisfies the internal Stage F / camera-ready gates, including theorem/proof audit, exercise/solution completeness, bibliography/history audit, notation/index audit, copyedit, PDF preflight, rendered-page inspection, and release checksums.
It means internally complete candidate. It does not mean protected admission, independent review, mathematical certification, or publication authority.
RC_DURABLY_ADMITTED
May be used only after the exact candidate identity is present on protected repository state and protected readback confirms that identity. The durable record must preserve the source/rebuild identity, release manifest/checksum identity, claim boundaries, and unresolved review obligations.
Durable admission is an institutional persistence state. It does not establish the truth of mathematical claims.
RC_REVIEW_QUALIFIED
May be used only when the applicable independent mathematical reader/referee has reviewed the exact admitted candidate and the review record identifies its scope, findings, limitations, and revision identity.
Machine-assisted self-audit, regression testing, or a second pass by the same composing process does not satisfy this state by itself.
PUBLISHED_AUTHORITATIVE_EDITION
Reserved for an explicit authority decision over the exact review-qualified revision. The decision must state the permitted representation/use. Publication layout, a release PDF, a Git tag, or public availability alone does not create this state.
Machine-readable status axes
Each active volume WORKSET_STATE.json SHOULD carry these independent fields once it reaches late development:
{
"composition_status": "...",
"durable_admission_status": "...",
"independent_review_status": "...",
"publication_authority_status": "..."
}
Recommended values are descriptive strings rather than a single overloaded status field. A volume may be composition-complete while durable admission remains pending.
Release-language rules
Allowed before durable admission:
- “internally complete RC1”;
- “composition-complete release candidate”;
- “external mathematical review pending.”
Not allowed before durable admission:
- “canonical RC1 on protected main”;
- “institutionally admitted RC1.”
Not allowed before independent review:
- “externally refereed”;
- “independently verified” when referring to the manuscript as a whole.
Not allowed before explicit authority disposition:
- “published authoritative edition”;
- any wording that converts an RC or review artifact into institutional authority by implication.
Exact-revision rule
Review and authority attach to an exact revision identity. Cosmetic or editorial changes may be judged non-material only under the controlling review/authority instrument. Substantive mathematical, semantic, evidentiary, or claim-scope changes require rebinding review and authority to the new revision.
Volume-transition rule
A later volume may cite or inherit a prior volume's formal content at the status actually achieved by that prior volume. It must not silently upgrade the prior volume's institutional state. For example, a later volume may build pedagogically on an internally complete RC while still stating that independent review remains open.
Volume II reconciliation
For Volume II — COMPREHENSION, the exact comprehensive RC1 is presently classified as:
- composition:
RC_COMPOSITION_COMPLETE; - durable admission:
RC_DURABLY_ADMITTED; - independent mathematical review:
PENDING_EXTERNAL_MATHEMATICAL_REVIEW; - publication authority:
NOT_GRANTED.
The exact admitted review target is bound to source archive SHA-256 1e1f4ae917e50514dc0a74fa706d30ad0d1c3dbf9ac2f45d7c8ad2445f3fd95a, protected admission commit 3615be3114ea3aceec14e02231e3a1647faa44b4, and protected release tree 8fae441820506bb6902e36c048cc475dc56242d5.
Gate 8 is tracked by issue #853. Its durable review packet is under monographs/type-theory/volume-ii-comprehension/reviews/RC1/. The next legitimate transition is genuinely independent mathematical review of that exact admitted revision. No self-audit, regression suite, CI run, or second pass by the composing process may substitute for the required independent reviewer record. Passing Gate 8 would permit RC_REVIEW_QUALIFIED only; publication authority remains a separate Gate 9 disposition.